Example of an
Observations and Questions for the Perpetua document.
Who wrote this
document? Can we trust that it is a true account of a historical event? What
does it tell us about early Christians' views of their religion? of the family?
of the persecution taking place in Rome? of Roman reasons for persecuting
Christians?
Most of it is in the
first person, but the beginning and ending were clearly not written by Perpetua
herself. The ending makes it clear that it was edited by a devout Christian who
wanted to use the example of Perpetua as inspiration for other Christians. This
raises the question of whether this author edited the original narrative to
make it more inspirational, or even made the whole thing up. Does it seem as if
the editor was writing close to the events or long after? Was he a witness or
relying on a text he had come upon?
Much of the text
concerns Perpetua's relationship with her family and her child. She does not
follow the traditional doctrine of honoring the parents. Although she loves
both her father and child, they are of much less importance to her than her
faith. She is happy when he father goes away, and says that he used the
arguments of the devil to seduce her. She grieved for her father not because
her whole family would suffer because of her, but because he was not happy she
was going to die. She looked at martyrdom not merely as something she had to
accept but as something to rejoice in. Would she have considered it right for
someone to go out and actively try to be a martyr?
Apparently early
Christians thought that visions from God would be common for believers, since
the brother suggests that Perpetua had the right to ask for one because of her
persistence in her belief. What do the visions mean? Do they fit in with
well-known religious themes or stories? What does it mean that Perpetua became
a man in one vision? What does this say about Roman or Christian beliefs? Why
is the devil an Egyptian?
The Romans did not ask that she give up her religion, but only that she should make a sacrifice for the emperor's success. Could she have honorably done this? Did Perpetua and the Romans understand each other's positions correctly? The Romans seem to see it as a question of patriotism not religion. What could have happened to make it possible for the emperor to accept Christianity only 80 years later? What does the Eusebius document suggest about this question